Regulatory Week

A series of 4 webinars to master the major regulatory and CSR issues facing brands (CSRD, Environmental Signage, AGEC, ESPR, DPP, Carbon Footprint).
organized by
arrow back
Back to articles

The latest updates to the Environmental Display methodology for the furniture sector

Discover the November 2023 updates to the methodological reference framework for environmental display in the furniture sector.

Adrien Esnault & Benjamin Thomas
December 21, 2023
Contents
Discover Waro

Methodological guidelines for the furniture sector

The aim of this standard is to provide companies and brands with a methodological framework for theenvironmental assessment of the furniture sector, as part of an eco-design and environmental display approach.

The aim of this project is to assess the environmental impact of furniture using a multi-criteria life-cycle approach.

The term "furniture" refers to products intended for domestic use (indoors and outdoors), furnishing living spaces such as living rooms, bedrooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bathrooms, offices, gardens, or for professional office use.

This methodological framework is constantly evolving, to reflect current eco-design and sustainability practices. In this article, we summarize the recent revision of the framework and its implications.

Updates in the November 2023 report.

Generally speaking, this evolution of the methodological reference framework for the furniture sector marks a rapprochement with the European methodology of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) METHODOLOGY. It also takes better account of the furniture sector's notions of circularity.

Product circularity

The way in which product circularity is taken into account when measuring impact has changed. From now on, the methodology will take into account the Circular Footprint Formula (CFF) set out in the European Commission's Product Environmental Footprint Method (PEF).

This update also clarifies how the use case of reusing a part of a piece of furniture is taken into account. Indeed, to assess the impact of a component re-used in a piece of furniture, the Circularity Formula (CFF) also applies.

If you would like to know more about these updates and the formulas used, you can access the published by ADEME here.

End of life

The new version of the standard has also been updated to take end-of-life into account, by specifying the different end-of-life scenarios. This development brings us closer to the realities of the recycling channels managed by Ecomaison and Valdelia.

Here is the summary table provided by the standard for end-of-life product management:

End-of-life management in the methodology
End-of-life management in the methodology

Product life cycle

The new version of the standard has also clarified the calculation of product lifespan.

If you want to claim a longer service life than the default, you can always rely on physical wear-resistance test standards.

But it is now possible to increase this lifespan by focusing on scalability and repairability.

To justify the upgradable or repairable nature of a piece of furniture, the standards propose several accepted methods of proof (presented on page 72 of the standards).

Key points to remember from the methodological reference framework

Product categories concerned :

The reference system groups together the elements needed to calculate the impact of the following product categories:

  • Bookcase, shelf
  • Non-library storage: cupboard, chest of drawers
  • Bathroom storage furniture
  • Kitchen storage units, dining tables
  • Office tables
  • Coffee tables
  • Chairs, seats, benches
  • Cupboard fronts
  • Bed frame (excluding slat base)

The revised standard now covers the following products:

  • Garden loungers
  • Office: operator headquarters
  • Office: visitor's chair

Study boundaries

In line with the ADEME guidelines, several stages are excluded from the environmental assessment. This is particularly the case for flows linked to product Research & Development, flows linked to employee home-to-work transport and business travel, as well as flows linked to product marketing and advertising.

The product use stage is also excluded from the boundaries of the study, as the scope does not include energy-consuming products.

Here are the steps taken into account:

  • Raw materials (finished product, production offcuts and packaging)
  • Material supply transport
  • Assembly plant energy consumption
  • Distribution transport
  • End-of-life of product, packaging and production waste

Lifecycle analysis

Calculating the environmental impact of products is made possible by carrying out a life cycle analysis (LCA).

To carry out an LCA, product components and packaging must account for at least 95% of the product's mass.

We have already written a full article on the LCA method, which you can read here.

Data required for environmental labelling

As a reminder, carrying out a product lifecycle analysis requires an upstream data collection phase.

The methodological frame of reference defines the data to be used for the LCA.

The repository defines 3 types of data:

  • Primary activity data (or specific data): data derived from direct measurement (e.g. the mass of steel in the product).
  • Secondary data (or generic data): data obtained from sources other than direct measurement (e.g. the environmental impact of 1kg of steel, data provided by ADEME's Empreinte database).
  • Semi-specific (or default) data: conservative default data that can be specified by the manufacturer if he has the means to do so in order to refine his environmental assessment.

To find out more about these different categories of data, please consult our dedicated article.

Some of the methodology's criteria are still under discussion:

Database

ADEME's Empreinte database should be used as a priority when applying this standard. Some of the necessary data is not available in the Empreinte database. In such cases, other databases can be used, in particular Ecoinvent (v3.8), GABI and EIME.

Product life cycle

Service life is a highly influential parameter in the environmental assessment of a product. This is why the way in which a product's lifespan is defined is crucial, and must be as accurate as possible.

The subject of duration must therefore not be addressed solely from the angle of physical durability, but must also take emotional durability into account. Taking this criterion into account is a debate that cuts across all business sectors.

This is particularly the case for the textile sector, for which a finalized methodology will be published before the furniture sector.

Not to be missed
Every month, receive the latest regulatory news and our advice on how to decipher it.
You'll receive the next news soon!
Error, please try again.
Similar articles
Understanding the PEF (Product Environmental Footprint) method
Concertation on Textile Environmental Signage: key points to remember
How to communicate the environmental impact of your products
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.